A workplace the brain can think in
Essay · The workplace · 10 Feb 2026 · by Nathan Gupta, Cognitive Neuroscientist at AWA
We design offices for many things — cost, density, the look of collaboration — and rarely for the one thing they are for: thinking.
Ask what an office is for and most answers are about people being together. Fair enough. But a great deal of what happens at work has nothing to do with collaboration. It is one person, thinking hard, trying to hold a problem in their head long enough to solve it. We design for the first thing and quietly punish the second.
The open plan is the clearest example. It optimises for visible activity and easy interruption, both of which feel like productivity and neither of which is the same as thinking. A space that is good for a brain doing hard work looks different: it gives people somewhere to go quiet, somewhere to be loud, and the freedom to choose between them as the work demands.
Hybrid did not settle this
Working from home solved the interruption problem for some people and created a connection problem for others. The lesson had nothing to do with which location wins. Focus and collaboration are different modes with different needs, and a workplace that pretends otherwise will serve neither well.
The best test of a workspace is simple: can someone do their hardest thinking here? Most fail it.
None of this requires a grand redesign. It requires taking the thinking seriously as a thing that needs conditions, and then protecting those conditions with the same care we give to the parts of work that are easier to see.
This site uses JavaScript for its full experience. In the meantime, reach me at
hello@nathangupta.com
or on LinkedIn.